When False Evidence Changed Myanmar's History
Myanmar’s best-documented hoaxes are not a neat collection of harmless monsters and theatrical impostors. They are stories about false antiquities, fabricated accusations, miscaptioned photographs and disguised propaganda.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The surviving record is uneven. Earlier frauds in the antiquities trade were often private transactions and are difficult to reconstruct, while digital falsehoods leave searchable copies, platform investigations and fact-checks. The clearest pattern is therefore modern: a claim moves from rumour to respectable-looking media, gains emotional force through religion or ethnic fear, and circulates much faster than its correction. In Myanmar, that pattern has sometimes done more than deceive collectors or embarrass publishers. It has helped mobilise crowds, rewrite history and conceal the identity of political propagandists.
When an earthquake created “ancient” treasures
One of Myanmar’s most persistent commercial deceptions concerns supposedly ancient Buddhist objects from Bagan. The city’s temples were badly damaged by an earthquake in 1975. According to historian Andrew Selth, dealers subsequently offered increasing numbers of bronze figures and votive objects said to have been discovered in caches exposed by the destruction. Fake religious sculptures had already existed, but the disaster supplied sellers with an unusually persuasive provenance story: the objects were presented not merely as old, but as treasures sealed inside medieval monuments until nature revealed them.[New Mandala]newmandala.orgNew Mandala Buyer beware: fakes, forgeries and fraudsters in MyanmarNew MandalaBuyer beware: fakes, forgeries and fraudsters in MyanmarApril 21, 2026 — 21 Apr 2026 — Fake metal Buddha statues and folk figu…
The claim was attractive because it explained several things at once. It accounted for the sudden appearance of previously unknown pieces, connected them to one of Myanmar’s most celebrated historic sites and discouraged awkward questions about ownership. A buyer could imagine acquiring an accidental archaeological discovery rather than a modern imitation or an object removed unlawfully from a religious building.
This was less a single hoax than a repeatable sales formula. Traders could combine genuinely old pieces, recent copies and altered objects while telling essentially the same earthquake story. That ambiguity matters: an object offered after 1975 was not automatically fake, and an authentic artefact might still have been illegally removed. Authenticity, age and lawful provenance are separate questions.
The episode also shows why forged antiquities often survive exposure. Scientific testing may reveal modern metal, artificial ageing or anachronistic workmanship, but many objects disappear into private collections before specialists examine them. Documentation supplied by the seller can then be repeated in auction catalogues and family histories until an unsupported claim begins to look like established provenance.
The safest lesson is not that every Bagan souvenir is fraudulent. It is that dramatic discovery stories are evidence only when supported by excavation records, ownership documents and expert examination. A tale about an earthquake may make an artefact memorable; it does not make it medieval.
The false accusation that preceded the Mandalay riots
The most devastating documented falsehood in modern Myanmar began with an allegation that two Muslim owners of a Mandalay tea shop had raped a Buddhist employee. The story appeared online and was amplified on Facebook, including by the nationalist monk Wirathu. Crowds gathered around the business in July 2014, violence spread through the city and two men—one Buddhist and one Muslim—were killed.[Reuters Japan]jp.reuters.comJapan Special Report：Why Facebook is losing the war on hate speechFacebook. So was the Myanmar government. In July of that year, riots broke out in the central city of Mandalay after false rumors spread…
Authorities later announced that the rape allegation had been fabricated. State reporting said the woman had been paid to make the claim as part of a personal or commercial dispute involving the tea-shop owners. Independent reporting confirmed that the official investigation found the supposed crime had not occurred.[dvb.no]english.dvb.noFalse rape claim caused riots, says ministryFalse rape claim caused riots, says ministryJuly 21, 2014 — 21 Jul 2014 — A rape case believed to have sparked recent riots in central…
The deception succeeded because it was built around an existing political narrative rather than an isolated invention. Myanmar had already experienced serious Buddhist-Muslim tension, and online nationalist networks were circulating warnings that Buddhism and the country’s majority identity were under threat. The accusation therefore reached an audience primed to interpret an alleged crime as evidence of a wider communal danger.
Facebook’s role was not simply that a false statement appeared on the platform. Myanmar’s rapid expansion of mobile internet access had made Facebook function, for many users, as news service, public square and internet browser at once. Reuters later found that the company struggled to identify dangerous posts in Myanmar languages and depended heavily on local civil-society groups to flag material. During the Mandalay violence, the authorities briefly restricted access after attempts to contact Facebook proved ineffective.[Reuters]reuters.commyanmar facebook hateWhy Facebook is losing the war on hate speech in Myanmar15 Aug 2018 — The Myanmar military stands accused by the U.N. of having co…
The case is sometimes described too loosely as a “Facebook riot”, as though software alone created the violence. That misses the people who invented, published and promoted the allegation, as well as the prejudices that made it persuasive. Yet it would be equally misleading to treat Facebook as a neutral pipe. A sensational accusation was copied at speed, endorsed by influential figures and delivered without the checks that a responsible newsroom should apply to an unverified criminal claim.
The correction arrived after the deaths. That timing is central to the story. A rumour can demand immediate emotional action, while an investigation takes days or weeks. By the time the allegation was officially declared false, its political work had already been done.
Fake photographs in an official “true news” history
In 2018, the Myanmar military published a book about the Rohingya crisis through its public-information operation. The volume presented itself as a corrective historical account, but a Reuters investigation found that three photographs had been falsely captioned or manipulated. The discovery was especially serious because the images were not anonymous social-media posts. They appeared in an official publication offered as documentary proof.[Reuters]reuters.comExclusiveExclusive
One photograph, printed in grainy black and white, was described as showing Rohingya migrants entering Myanmar during the colonial period. Reuters traced it to a colour photograph taken in 1996 of refugees fleeing the aftermath of genocide in Rwanda. The image had been altered and reversed, stripping away visual clues to its real origin.[Reuters]reuters.comExclusiveExclusive
Another picture was captioned to suggest that Rohingya people had killed members of other ethnic communities in Myanmar during the 1940s. Reuters found that it came from the 1971 Bangladesh war. A third photograph, genuinely taken in Myanmar, was presented with a caption that reversed the identity of those pictured: people leaving the country were portrayed as arrivals.[Reuters]reuters.comCorrected: ExclusiveCorrected: Exclusive
These were not decorative mistakes. Each altered caption supported the book’s central political argument: that the Rohingya were foreign intruders and historic aggressors rather than a long-established community subjected to persecution. The photographs created an illusion of archival continuity, implying that contemporary military claims were confirmed by visual records stretching back decades.
After Reuters published its findings, the military issued a rare apology and acknowledged that two photographs had been “published incorrectly”. That wording treated the problem as an editorial error rather than explaining how unrelated pictures from Rwanda and Bangladesh had acquired detailed Myanmar captions.[Reuters]reuters.comOpen source on reuters.com.
The episode demonstrates why photographs are powerful instruments of propaganda. A written claim invites argument; a photograph appears to say, “this happened”. But photographs establish only what was in front of a camera at a particular moment. Without a verified date, location, photographer and chain of publication, even a genuine image can become a false document.
It also illustrates a broader distinction. The images themselves were not fabricated from nothing. The deception lay in selection, alteration and captioning. This type of visual fraud is often more convincing than an entirely invented picture because reverse-image searches or archival research are needed to expose it.
Disguised propaganda on Facebook
The military’s use of misleading imagery was accompanied by a less visible deception: political messaging presented as independent entertainment, news or public opinion. In August 2018, Facebook removed accounts and pages connected to senior military figures and announced that it had discovered networks using apparently independent news and opinion pages to promote military narratives covertly. The first large removal involved pages followed by almost 12 million people.[About Facebook]about.fb.comAbout Facebook Removing Myanmar Military Officials From FacebookAbout Facebook Removing Myanmar Military Officials From Facebook
Further investigation revealed pages branded around beauty, celebrities, teachers and popular entertainment. Their ordinary appearance helped them build large audiences before introducing political content. Facebook later removed hundreds more pages, groups and accounts that it linked to the military, saying their operators had misrepresented who they were and how they were coordinated.[About Facebook]about.fb.comAbout Facebook Removing Myanmar Military Officials From FacebookAbout Facebook Removing Myanmar Military Officials From Facebook
This technique differs from openly labelled state propaganda. A military newspaper asks readers to trust the military. A lifestyle page that quietly inserts military talking points asks readers to believe that the message comes from fellow citizens, popular culture or an unaffiliated news source. The falsehood is partly about authorship: the audience is denied information needed to judge the speaker’s interests.
The operation also mixed factual, entertaining and inflammatory material. That mixture was useful. A page did not need to publish false claims continuously; harmless posts attracted followers and made occasional propaganda appear familiar. Investigators therefore looked beyond individual statements to shared administrators, account behaviour, technical connections and coordinated posting.
Facebook found further Myanmar networks in 2019 and 2020. One operation used fake and duplicate accounts, stock photographs of women and images of celebrities or social-media personalities. The company linked it to members of the Myanmar military and said it discussed military affairs, the 2020 election, the government and the Rohingya.[About Facebook]about.fb.comAbout Facebook Removing Coordinated Inauthentic BehaviorAbout Facebook Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior
After the February 2021 coup, the disguise became more elaborate. Facebook reported removing a military-linked network in which some accounts posed as protesters or opposition supporters and entered pro-democracy groups, while others operated pro-military pages. A small number used profile pictures probably generated by machine-learning systems, meaning the supposed account holders may never have existed.[About Facebook]about.fb.comJuly 2021 CIB ReportJuly 2021 CIB Report
The important point is not that every anonymous account was military-run. Nor does a platform takedown prove every post was false. Coordinated inauthentic behaviour is primarily a finding about concealed organisation: accounts pretend to be independent when they are working together. Its deceptive power comes from manufacturing the appearance of spontaneous public agreement.
How recycled images turned real suffering into competing hoaxes
During the 2017 violence in Rakhine State, social media filled with shocking photographs said to show atrocities committed either by Rohingya militants or against Rohingya civilians. Some depicted genuine suffering but came from other countries or earlier conflicts. Campaigners warned that images from unrelated events were being republished with new captions, making verification harder amid a genuine humanitarian emergency.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian Fake news images add fuel to fire in Myanmar, after moreThe Guardian Fake news images add fuel to fire in Myanmar, after more
This is a particularly damaging form of misinformation because the wider crisis was not imaginary. United Nations investigators documented consistent patterns of grave abuses in Myanmar, while the circulation of false or miscaptioned material allowed propagandists to dismiss authentic evidence alongside the fakes.[OHCHR]ohchr.orgOpen source on ohchr.org.
Recycled atrocity photographs usually exploit three features:
- Graphic urgency. Viewers feel pressure to share immediately rather than verify.
- Missing provenance. Cropped screenshots remove captions, dates, photographers and original links.
- A polarised audience. Competing communities circulate images that confirm what they already believe about the other side.
The result is not simply confusion between truth and falsehood. Each exposed fake becomes ammunition. One side points to a miscaptioned image as proof that all allegations are fabricated; the other treats scepticism as evidence of complicity. In that environment, correction can deepen hostility instead of resolving it.
Myanmar’s experience also complicates the familiar instruction to “trust photographs”. A picture can be authentic and its claim false. Verification requires matching landmarks, weather, clothing, upload history and earlier publications, then comparing the material with eyewitness accounts or satellite evidence. The decisive question is not whether the pixels have been digitally invented, but whether the image shows the event described.
The everyday fakes that imitate journalism
Not every Myanmar hoax has involved mass violence. Some reveal the smaller mechanics by which a lie borrows credibility from familiar media.
In 2020, for example, a doctored image purporting to show a page from the newspaper Golden Hand circulated on Facebook. It claimed that opposition politician Than Htay had promised to ban the speaking of English if his party came to power. AFP compared the image with the newspaper and obtained a denial from its editors, establishing that the page had been altered.[AFP Fact Check]factcheck.afp.comfabricated myanmar newspaper report claims politician plans ban englishfabricated myanmar newspaper report claims politician plans ban english
The joke-like absurdity of the alleged policy may have helped rather than hindered circulation. People share political fabrications for several reasons: because they believe them, because they find them funny, because they want to ridicule an opponent or because they regard accuracy as less important than the message. Once detached from its original poster, satire, partisan abuse and deliberate deception can become indistinguishable.
The fake newspaper page used a simple but effective visual shortcut. Instead of asking readers to trust an unknown Facebook account, it displayed the layout and typography of an established publication. The imitation supplied authority before anyone read the words.
Such cases matter because they show that sophisticated technology is unnecessary. A basic image editor, a recognisable logo and an emotionally satisfying claim can be enough. Artificial intelligence may increase the volume and realism of fabrications, but Myanmar’s most consequential examples have often relied on older methods: false captions, impersonated sources, paid testimony and concealed sponsorship.
Why these stories were believed
Myanmar’s hoaxes vary greatly, but their most effective mechanisms recur.
They attached themselves to existing fears. The Mandalay allegation fitted anti-Muslim narratives already circulating. Propaganda about the Rohingya drew on a long-running political effort to portray the community as recent foreign migrants. A falsehood that confirms an established worldview faces less resistance than one asking people to adopt an entirely new belief.[forum-asia.org]forum-asia.orgPervasive Hate Speech and the Role of Facebook in MyanmarPervasive Hate Speech and the Role of Facebook in Myanmar
They borrowed trusted forms. Fake antiquities came with discovery legends; propaganda appeared as a history book; political fabrications copied newspaper pages; military operators hid behind lifestyle and entertainment brands. The presentation answered the question “why should I believe this?” before audiences thought to ask it.
They exploited weak points in the information system. Myanmar’s rapid transition from restricted media to mass mobile connectivity produced enormous demand for news without an equally rapid growth in independent reporting, digital literacy or local-language moderation. Facebook’s commissioned human-rights assessment concluded that the platform had not done enough to prevent its services from being used to foment division and offline violence.[Reuters]reuters.commyanmar facebook hateWhy Facebook is losing the war on hate speech in Myanmar15 Aug 2018 — The Myanmar military stands accused by the U.N. of having co…
They made verification slower than sharing. Establishing the origin of a photograph, investigating a criminal allegation or authenticating a bronze requires expertise and time. Reposting requires seconds. UNESCO’s media-literacy work in Myanmar has consequently stressed source evaluation as a first line of defence against disinformation.[UNESCO]unesco.orgOpen source on unesco.org.
They blurred the identity of the beneficiary. The person spreading a rumour may not know who invented it. A propaganda page may appear to be run by fans or journalists rather than soldiers. An antiquities dealer can attribute an object’s history to an unnamed villager or previous owner. Concealed sponsorship allows interested parties to speak with borrowed independence.
What exposure can—and cannot—repair
The decisive evidence in Myanmar’s major hoax cases has usually come from comparison rather than confession. Investigators matched photographs to earlier archives, questioned the supposed victim of a crime, examined networks of shared account administrators or asked a newspaper whether it had printed the page attributed to it.
These methods can establish that a particular claim is false, but exposure rarely restores the situation that existed before the deception. The Mandalay investigation could not undo two deaths. Identifying photographs from Rwanda and Bangladesh could not erase the military book’s wider narrative from every copy or repost. Removing covert pages did not reveal how many users had accepted their messages or transferred them into private conversations.
Corrections also inherit an asymmetry. The hoax is usually vivid: an accusation, an atrocity photograph, a newly discovered treasure. The correction is procedural: metadata, provenance documents, interviews and account-administration records. The more responsible explanation may therefore feel less emotionally satisfying than the lie it replaces.
Myanmar’s hoax history is ultimately not a story of national gullibility. It is a record of how deception becomes powerful when authority is concentrated, independent media are constrained, social divisions are politically useful and new communication systems expand faster than safeguards. The most memorable cases reveal the same uncomfortable principle: people do not usually believe a falsehood because it looks obviously false. They believe it because someone has carefully made it resemble a truth they already recognise.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to When False Evidence Changed Myanmar's History. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Constitution of Knowledge
Matches the page's themes of false evidence and information disorder.
The River of Lost Footsteps
Provides historical context for modern political narratives.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: jp.reuters.com
Title: Japan Special Report：Why Facebook is losing the war on hate speech
Link:https://jp.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-facebook-hate-specialreport/special-report-why-facebook-is-losing-the-war-on-hate-speech-in-myanmar-idUSKBN1L01JY/
Source snippet
Facebook. So was the Myanmar government. In July of that year, riots broke out in the central city of Mandalay after false rumors spread...
2.
Source: english.dvb.no
Title: False rape claim caused riots, says ministry
Link:https://english.dvb.no/false-rape-claim-caused-riots-says-ministry-burma-myanmar/
Source snippet
False rape claim caused riots, says ministryJuly 21, 2014 — 21 Jul 2014 — A rape case believed to have sparked recent riots in central...
Published: July 21, 2014
3.
Source: reuters.com
Title: myanmar facebook hate
Link:https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/myanmar-facebook-hate/
Source snippet
Why Facebook is losing the war on hate speech in Myanmar15 Aug 2018 — The Myanmar military stands accused by the U.N. of having co...
4.
Source: reuters.com
Link:https://www.reuters.com/article/world/exclusive-[fake-photos
5.
Source: reuters.com
Title: Corrected: Exclusive
Link:https://www.reuters.com/article/world/corrected-exclusive-fake-photos-in-myanmar-armys-true-news-book-on-the-roh-idUSKCN1LF2LC/
6.
Source: reuters.com
Link:https://www.reuters.com/article/world/myanmar-army-apologizes-for-mistaken-photos-in-book-on-rohingya-crisis-idUSKCN1LJ197/
7.
Source: time.com
Link:https://time.com/5383780/myanmar-facebook-propaganda-rohingya/
8.
Source: ohchr.org
Link:https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFM-Myanmar/A_HRC_39_64.pdf
9.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Title: fabricated myanmar newspaper report claims politician plans ban english
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/fabricated-myanmar-newspaper-report-claims-politician-plans-ban-english
10.
Source: forum-asia.org
Title: Pervasive Hate Speech and the Role of Facebook in Myanmar
Link:https://forum-asia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Pervasive-Hate-Speech-and-the-Role-of-Facebook-in-Myanmar.pdf
11.
Source: unesco.org
Link:https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/media-and-information-literacy-first-line-defence-against-disinformation
12.
Source: facebook.com
Title: on 21 april 1934 the british newspaper the daily mail published what became one
Link:https://www.facebook.com/HistoryInPictures/posts/on-21-april-1934-the-british-newspaper-the-daily-mail-published-what-became-one-/1423314789827923/
Published: april 1934
13.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/208332826391090/posts/342882452936126/
14.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/IOMZimbabwe/posts/the-story-of-chiedza-a-zimbabwean-woman-trafficked-to-myanmar-and-forced-into-on/1407224008109281/
15.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/ThaiPBSWorld/posts/four-ancient-statues-of-the-lord-buddha-and-his-incarnation-which-were-smuggled-/1231290699003450/
16.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1809071096087939/posts/4297942347200789/
17.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/AFPFactCheck/?locale=en_GB
18.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/MyanmarMechanism/posts/%EF%B8%8F-hatespeech-can-lead-to-discrimination-and-violence-especially-when-spread-and-/1434048362088114/
19.
Source: ohchr.org
Link:https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Expression/disinformation/2-Civil-society-organisations/ARTICLE19.pdf
20.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Title: fact checking search results
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/fact-checking-search-results?keywords=lgbtq&page=529
21.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Title: fact checking search results
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/fact-checking-search-results?keywords=india&page=527
22.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Title: fact checking search results
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/fact-checking-search-results?keywords=fake+tweet&page=512
23.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/
24.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.824E663
25.
Source: reuters.com
Link:https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/
26.
Source: reuters.com
Link:https://www.reuters.com/video/watch/idRCV005JLE/
27.
Source: reuters.com
Link:https://www.reuters.com/article/world/myanmar-army-apologises-for-mistaken-photos-in-book-on-rohingya-crisis-idUSKCN1LJ19M/
28.
Source: reuters.com
Title: facebook takes down main page myanmar military 2021 02 21
Link:https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/facebook-takes-down-main-page-myanmar-military-2021-02-21/
29.
Source: reuters.com
Title: myanmar convicts five over fake rape claim that sparked riots id USKBN0MG117
Link:https://www.reuters.com/article/world/myanmar-convicts-five-over-fake-rape-claim-that-sparked-riots-idUSKBN0MG117/
30.
Source: newmandala.org
Title: New Mandala Buyer beware: fakes, forgeries and fraudsters in Myanmar
Link:https://www.newmandala.org/buyer-beware-fakes-forgeries-and-fraudsters-in-myanmar/
Source snippet
New MandalaBuyer beware: fakes, forgeries and fraudsters in MyanmarApril 21, 2026 — 21 Apr 2026 — Fake metal Buddha statues and folk figu...
Published: April 21, 2026
31.
Source: abc.net.au
Title: false rape claim sparked myanmar riots
Link:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-21/false-rape-claim-sparked-myanmar-riots/5610300
Source snippet
ABC NewsFalse rape claim behind religious riots: Myanmar media20 Jul 2014 — Myanmar's latest religious clashes were sparked after a Buddh...
32.
Source: taipeitimes.com
Link:https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2018/09/02/2003699668
33.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: About Facebook Removing Myanmar Military Officials From Facebook
Link:https://about.fb.com/news/2018/08/removing-myanmar-officials/
34.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: About Facebook Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior
Link:https://about.fb.com/news/2020/10/removing-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-september-report/
35.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: more cib myanmar
Link:https://about.fb.com/news/2019/08/more-cib-myanmar/
36.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: July 2021 CIB Report
Link:https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/July-2021-CIB-Report.pdf
Published: July 2021
37.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: The Guardian Fake news images add fuel to fire in Myanmar, after more
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/sep/05/fake-news-images-add-fuel-to-fire-in-myanmar-after-more-than-400-deaths
38.
Source: about.fb.com
Link:https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/bsr-facebook-myanmar-hria_final.pdf
39.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: inside feed coordinated inauthentic behavior
Link:https://about.fb.com/news/2018/12/inside-feed-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior/
40.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: February 2020 CIB Report
Link:https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/February-2020-CIB-Report.pdf
Published: February 2020
41.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: April 2020 CIB Report
Link:https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/April-2020-CIB-Report.pdf
Published: April 2020
42.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: removing coordinated inauthentic behavior mexico iran myanmar
Link:https://about.fb.com/news/2020/10/removing-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-mexico-iran-myanmar/
43.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: removing coordinated inauthentic behavior
Link:https://about.fb.com/news/2020/02/removing-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior/
44.
Source: about.fb.com
Title: Integrity Timeline
Link:https://about.fb.com/ja/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2021/05/Integrity-Timeline-.pdf
45.
Source: x.com
Link:https://x.com/AFPFactCheck?lang=en
46.
Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
Link:https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/running-news-site-food-stall-how-myanmars-exiled-media-fighting-survive-brutal-funding-crisis
47.
Source: mediareform.org.uk
Link:https://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Reuters_Handbook_of_Journalism.pdf
48.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: myanmar army fakes photos and history in sinister rewrite of rohingya crisis
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/31/myanmar-army-fakes-photos-and-history-in-sinister-rewrite-of-rohingya-crisis
Additional References
49.
Source: wired.com
Link:https://www.wired.com/story/how-facebooks-rise-fueled-chaos-and-confusion-in-myanmar
Source snippet
Initially seen as a connectivity opportunity in a country emerging from military rule, Facebook quickly became the primary source of info...
50.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njJjbbbKEs0
Source snippet
Myanmar Facebook disinformation propaganda Facebook becomes outlet for religious anger in Myanmar AFP News Agency...
51.
Source: apnews.com
Title: general news a8fffd85ba8a4ee087de21944a2593ba
Link:https://apnews.com/general-news-a8fffd85ba8a4ee087de21944a2593ba
Source snippet
AP NewsMyanmar finds rape case causing unrest was faked20 Jul 2014 — YANGON, Myanmar (AP) — The alleged rape of a Buddhist woman by two M...
52.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIkfq0OVkBQ
Source snippet
Fake news on Facebook fans the flames of hate against the Rohingya in Burma...
53.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Fake news on Facebook fans the flames of hate against the Rohingya in Burma
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_fqf6bk7Oc
Source snippet
Rohingya Genocide And Propaganda: Persecution and False Images Dishonours the Victims...
54.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Facebook suspends disinformation accounts in Russia, Iran and Myanmar
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkfjvLlhHSs
Source snippet
Facebook’s Role in the Myanmar Crisis: The Spread of Misinformation and Its Consequences...
55.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Facebook becomes outlet for religious anger in Myanmar
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54X_HpAdpgc
Source snippet
Facebook suspends disinformation accounts in Russia, Iran and Myanmar...
56.
Source: artsofasia.com
Link:https://artsofasia.com/buddhist-art-of-myanmar-an-exhibition-at-asia-society-new-york/
57.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/Gemstones/comments/13q6acx/burmese_gems_illegal/
58.
Source: thenaturalrubycompany.com
Link:https://thenaturalrubycompany.com/education/conflict-free-rubies/?srsltid=AfmBOoq4dkDWOwpn_baK92–Qd4C64hcroDo9ETcor4R-WGgQcHaEByl
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 192
- Albanian Hoaxes
- Algerian Hoaxes
- Antigua Deceptions
- Argentina Hoaxes
- Armenian Hoaxes
- +187 more in sidebar