Indonesia's Most Powerful Hoaxes and False Legends
Indonesia’s most revealing hoax stories range from tiny “mummified creatures” and supposed alien crop circles to a prehistoric super-civilisation and one of modern Asia’s most destructive propaganda campaigns. They did not all work in the same way.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The most important distinction is between deliberate fraud and claims that became misleading through exaggeration, weak evidence or repeated retelling. A fabricated monster can be tested as an object. An archaeological claim can collapse when its dating methods are examined. Political propaganda is harder to undo because it becomes embedded in films, monuments, education and public memory. Indonesia’s hoax history therefore offers more than a collection of strange tales: it shows how authority, emotion and media format can make doubtful claims feel true.
The propaganda story that reshaped a nation
The most consequential Indonesian case concerns the killings of six army generals and one lieutenant during the 30 September Movement of 1965. Army-controlled newspapers alleged that members of the left-wing women’s organisation Gerwani had sexually tortured, mutilated and castrated the captives at Lubang Buaya before their deaths. The story portrayed communist women not simply as political enemies but as sadistic, sexually depraved figures outside acceptable society.
Contemporary autopsy findings did not support the lurid mutilation story. Scholars examining the episode have found that the victims suffered gunshot wounds and other injuries associated with their capture and killing, but not the elaborate sexual torture described in army publications. The allegations nevertheless supplied emotionally powerful material for the campaign against the Communist Party of Indonesia and organisations associated with it.[nobleworld.biz]nobleworld.bizLubang Buaya: Myth, Misogyny and MassacreNebulaIn a new twist to the propaganda theme it was alleged that the atrocities had actually been carried out by Gerwani members. Thus on…
The deception succeeded because it joined several potent anxieties. It invoked fear of communism, disgust at alleged sexual transgression and unease about politically active women. The allegations also appeared during a confused struggle for power, when the army controlled important channels of information and potential witnesses were being arrested, intimidated or killed. A sensational account delivered by an apparently authoritative source could therefore travel faster than any forensic correction.
Under President Suharto’s New Order government, the official version became a national ritual. It appeared in school materials, at the Sacred Pancasila Monument and in the state-sponsored film The Treason of the 30 September Movement/PKI, which generations of pupils were required or strongly encouraged to watch. Repetition transformed a disputed propaganda narrative into something that many viewers remembered as witnessed history.[springer.com]link.springer.comThe Sacred Pancasila Museum and Monument (Lubang…July 12, 2025 — This propaganda campaign resulted in the organized massacre o…
This was not a harmless urban legend. Anti-communist violence following the events of 1965 killed or imprisoned vast numbers of people, while Gerwani members and other women accused of communist involvement faced detention, sexual violence and lasting stigma. Estimates of the wider death toll vary substantially, but historians agree that mass killing and incarceration accompanied the army’s destruction of the political left. The Lubang Buaya story helped make that repression appear morally necessary.[Springer]link.springer.comThe Sacred Pancasila Museum and Monument (Lubang…July 12, 2025 — This propaganda campaign resulted in the organized massacre o…
The case remains difficult because the full history of the 30 September Movement is still debated. Rejecting the false sexual-mutilation narrative does not settle every question about who planned the operation or how responsibility was divided. It does, however, demonstrate that uncertainty about a complex political event cannot be used to preserve claims contradicted by medical and historical evidence.
The “world’s oldest pyramid” that outran its evidence
Gunung Padang in West Java is a genuine and important archaeological site: a hilltop complex of stone terraces made from volcanic columns. The disputed claim was that the visible remains formed only the upper portion of an enormous human-built pyramid, perhaps constructed in stages beginning more than 20,000 years ago. Such a date would place monumental architecture at the site deep in the last Ice Age, long before the accepted emergence of comparable large-scale building traditions.
The idea gained publicity well before it reached an academic journal. Geophysical surveys were interpreted as showing artificial layers and underground chambers, and the project received political attention during the presidency of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. Indonesian archaeologists and geologists objected that natural volcanic formations and later human modification were being combined into a speculative reconstruction. The dispute consequently became entangled with national pride: the possibility that Indonesia contained the world’s oldest pyramid was much more attractive to popular media than a technical disagreement about soil, lava and archaeological context.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian'Really, really weak': experts attack claim that IndonesiaDecember 16, 2023 — 16 Dec 2023 — Sensational report that Indonesia's Gunung Padang site is 25,000 years old is dismissed by archaeologis…
A paper published online in 2023 argued that Gunung Padang contained a sophisticated buried structure built through several phases, with the earliest possibly dating to about 27,000 years ago. Critics pointed out that extraordinarily old radiocarbon dates had been obtained from soil that was not securely associated with artefacts, masonry or other evidence of human construction. Dating ancient soil establishes the age of material in the ground; it does not by itself prove that people built the surrounding formation at the same time.
The journal Archaeological Prospection retracted the paper in March 2024. The retraction stated that the dated soil samples were not connected to features that could reliably be identified as human-made, so the interpretation of an extremely ancient pyramid was not supported.[Wiley Online Library]onlinelibrary.wiley.comOpen source on wiley.com.
It is more accurate to call Gunung Padang a case of pseudoarchaeology and unsupported interpretation than a proven deliberate hoax. The site itself is real, the survey instruments were real, and some researchers appear to have sincerely defended their conclusions. What failed was the logical bridge between the measurements and the extraordinary historical story built from them.
The retraction did not end the legend. Online posts continued to describe Gunung Padang as a 25,000-year-old pyramid, sometimes illustrating the claim with artificial-intelligence images that bore little resemblance to the actual terraces. In 2025, fact-checkers found widely shared posts using invented visuals to present the rejected interpretation as an established discovery.[AFP Fact Check]factcheck.afp.comOpen source on afp.com.
Gunung Padang shows why “hidden history” stories are unusually durable. A correction must explain dating, geological formation and archaeological context. The original claim needs only a striking picture and the phrase “older than Egypt”.
The miniature monsters tested in a laboratory
Among Indonesia’s best-known supernatural curiosities are small, dried humanoid figures commonly presented as mysterious creatures. They have long hair, claw-like nails, exposed teeth and bodies that resemble miniature mummies. Owners and exhibitors have variously described them as supernatural beings, rare animals or spiritually powerful objects requiring offerings.
Their appearance is carefully suited to display. They are small enough to transport, grotesque enough to attract attention and ambiguous enough to invite competing explanations. Exhibitions and private showings can generate money, while an owner’s claim that the object possesses dangerous powers discourages casual handling or destructive testing.
A forensic study published in the Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences examined hair taken from several specimens said to have come from Indonesia. Microscopy and mitochondrial DNA analysis indicated that the samples were human rather than the hair of an unknown animal. The genetic profile was consistent across the samples, and some hairs appeared to have been cut and inserted into the figures with the root ends facing outward.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.
The study did not analyse every specimen in circulation or reconstruct the complete materials used in each body. It therefore cannot prove that every object sold or displayed under the same name was made in an identical workshop. It does, however, undermine the claim that the tested figures represented an undiscovered species. Human hair deliberately attached to an object is evidence of manufacture, not zoological mystery.
These objects sit at the boundary between fraud, religious material culture and sideshow entertainment. Some makers or sellers may knowingly misrepresent them. Some owners may sincerely believe that a manufactured figure can acquire supernatural power. Visitors may also treat the exhibition as frightening entertainment without fully accepting its claims. Calling the entire tradition a single hoax would flatten those differences, but laboratory examination can still expose specific physical deceptions.
When a rice field became evidence of aliens
In January 2011, a large geometric pattern appeared in a rice field near Sleman in Yogyakarta. Reports quickly connected it with unidentified flying objects, and crowds came to see what was described as Indonesia’s first major crop circle. News coverage repeated local speculation about unusual sounds, possible spacecraft and the precision of the design.[Antara News]en.antaranews.comAntara News UFO-related "crop circle" found In Yogyakarta rice fieldAntara News UFO-related "crop circle" found In Yogyakarta rice field
The mystery followed a familiar crop-circle formula. A pattern discovered overnight seemed too large or orderly to have been made casually, while the absence of an immediately identified maker encouraged extraordinary explanations. The damaged field itself acted as physical evidence, even though flattened crops reveal little about who flattened them.
Confusion increased when an online account claimed that students from Gadjah Mada University had admitted making the formation. That supposed confession was itself challenged as an unsupported online fabrication. Contemporary reporting noted that the circulating blog story offered no reliable proof that the named students existed or had participated.[detiknews]news.detik.comtulisan crop circle di sleman dibuat mahasiswa ugm hoaxtulisan crop circle di sleman dibuat mahasiswa ugm hoax
The episode is useful precisely because it lacks a clean ending. There is no credible evidence that an alien craft produced the pattern, but the most widely repeated account of a student confession was also doubtful. The reasonable conclusion is not that every alternative explanation is equally likely. Human manufacture is overwhelmingly more consistent with known crop-circle methods than extraterrestrial visitation, yet identifying the probable type of cause is different from proving the identity of the makers.
This is a common feature of hoax history: a weak debunking story can attach itself to a weak original claim. Once both versions circulate, readers are invited to choose between two dramatic narratives rather than accept the less satisfying position that the object was almost certainly human-made but the available reporting did not establish exactly who made it.
Photographs that were false on purpose
Indonesian artist Agan Harahap has produced manipulated photographs placing himself or other unlikely figures beside international celebrities and in invented historical scenes. One widely circulated image appeared to show him drinking with Metallica singer James Hetfield, although the meeting never happened.
Harahap’s work differs from an ordinary scam because the deception is part of the artwork. He has described the images as commentary on the ease with which social-media users accept and redistribute attractive falsehoods. Some viewers recognise the joke or artistic intervention; others encounter a detached copy with no indication that the picture was fabricated.[ABC News]abc.net.auABC News The Indonesian artist fooling the world with his photosABC News The Indonesian artist fooling the world with his photos
This creates a difficult category: the creator may not intend permanent deception, but the platform removes the clues that establish satire. A manipulated picture can pass from an artist’s account to reposts, news aggregators and private messages, losing its caption and context at every stage. The eventual audience may see only apparently photographic proof.
Harahap’s work anticipated a central problem of the artificial-intelligence era. The meaning of a false image cannot always be determined from the pixels alone. A picture may be art in one setting, parody in another and misinformation when recirculated as evidence.
Disaster rumours and the economics of panic
False information becomes especially dangerous after earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic eruptions because people urgently need forecasts, transport details and news of relatives. Reliable information may be delayed by damaged communications, while messages from friends or local groups feel immediate and personal.
After the September 2018 earthquake and tsunami in Central Sulawesi, false reports claimed that another larger earthquake was imminent, that a dam was about to fail, that Palu’s mayor had died and that free flights were available for victims’ families. Old disaster photographs were relabelled as current scenes. Videos from volcanic eruptions elsewhere were also presented as footage from Indonesia.[The Guardian]theguardian.comOpen source on theguardian.com.
These messages did not require sophisticated fabrication. A recycled photograph, invented warning or altered caption was enough because survivors already had strong reasons to fear another catastrophe. In areas affected by electricity and network failures, rumours also spread face to face, making it harder to trace an original source or attach a visible correction.
Some disaster hoaxes may be attention-seeking, while others can support theft, fraud or political criticism. A rumour that residents must flee may leave property unattended. A false transport offer can harvest personal information or payments. Even messages circulated by well-meaning users can redirect emergency resources and burden officials with repeated denials.
The response in 2018 showed the increasing importance of named, recognisable debunkers. National disaster agency spokesman Sutopo Purwo Nugroho repeatedly used social media to identify recycled or manipulated material and provide verified updates. The government also announced regular briefings intended to correct prominent false claims.[The Guardian]theguardian.comOpen source on theguardian.com.
Election hoaxes and paid amplification
By the 2010s, the Indonesian word commonly used for an online falsehood had become part of everyday political discussion. Election campaigns employed organised social-media operators, often called “buzzers”, to amplify favourable messages, attack opponents and create the appearance of spontaneous public opinion.
During the 2019 election period, Reuters documented networks of account operators and content producers working in an environment where misleading claims frequently exploited religious, ethnic and ideological divisions. Fact-checkers described a constant contest with fabricated stories disguised as journalism, including allegations that officials were secretly controlled by China.[Reuters]reuters.comIn Indonesia, Facebook and Twitter are 'buzzerIn Indonesia, Facebook and Twitter are 'buzzer
Candidates were accused through images and technical-looking claims that were easy to share but difficult to verify quickly. One rumour claimed that President Joko Widodo received answers through a hidden earpiece during a televised debate; counter-rumours alleged that his opponent used smart glasses. Enlarged screenshots and confident commentary gave ordinary clothing or reflections the appearance of forensic evidence.[ABC News]abc.net.auABC News Internet trolls are trying to bring down Indonesia's PresidentABC News Internet trolls are trying to bring down Indonesia's President
The people benefiting from such material were not limited to candidates. Content producers could be paid for posts, websites could earn advertising revenue from outrage, and partisan users gained status by supplying their communities with apparent proof of betrayal. The system rewarded speed and emotional certainty rather than correction.
Civil-society fact-checkers became central to the response. The Anti-Defamation, Hoax and Intolerance Society, commonly known by its Indonesian abbreviation MAFINDO, maintained public debunks and worked with journalists and technology platforms. Its analysis indicated a sharp increase in political misinformation as the 2019 vote approached.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian Fake news spikes in Indonesia ahead of electionsThe Guardian Fake news spikes in Indonesia ahead of elections
Anti-hoax enforcement creates its own risk, however. Laws intended to punish deliberate fabrication can also be applied to critics, satirists or people who make mistakes. The Indonesian experience therefore illustrates a broader problem: a government may be a necessary source of emergency corrections while also possessing strong incentives to label inconvenient speech as false.
Deepfakes turned political authority into a sales tool
The latest stage of Indonesian deception uses synthetic audio and video to impersonate public officials. In late 2024 and early 2025, manipulated clips appeared to show President Prabowo Subianto and other senior figures offering government assistance. Viewers were directed to WhatsApp contacts and asked to pay supposed administrative charges before receiving benefits that did not exist.
Indonesian police arrested a suspect in January 2025 and said the scheme had used deepfake videos of the president, vice-president and other officials. By April, two suspects had reportedly been handed to prosecutors.[INP | Indonesian National Police]inp.polri.go.idINP | Indonesian National Police INP Arrests Suspect Behind Deepfake ScamsINP | Indonesian National Police INP Arrests Suspect Behind Deepfake Scams
The fraud worked by combining new technology with an old confidence trick. The synthetic face created authority; social media supplied distribution; private messaging isolated the victim; and the requested fee was kept small enough to appear plausible. Reports described victims paying hundreds of thousands of rupiah for promised aid.[AFP Fact Check]factcheck.afp.comOpen source on afp.com.
Deepfakes are harder to counter through simple visual advice than early manipulated photographs. Warning signs such as poor lip synchronisation or unnatural facial movement may disappear as tools improve. The more reliable checks are external: whether the offer appears on an official government channel, whether payment is demanded, whether the contact moves immediately to a private number, and whether established news or fact-checking organisations have confirmed the programme.
Why the same stories keep returning
Indonesia’s famous hoaxes differ in scale, but the most successful share several mechanisms.
They borrow authority. Political propaganda appears in newspapers, films and museums. Archaeological speculation appears in a scholarly journal. A scam uses the face of a president. The message becomes persuasive before the audience examines the evidence.
They attach themselves to existing hopes or fears. A prehistoric pyramid promises a glorious lost civilisation. A supernatural object promises power. A disaster rumour exploits fear of another shock. Political disinformation activates older anxieties about communism, religion or ethnicity.
They provide vivid objects. A corpse-like figurine, a geometric field, a photograph or a video feels more convincing than an abstract claim. Yet objects do not interpret themselves. Human hair does not prove a tiny monster, old soil does not prove an Ice Age pyramid, and a moving face does not prove that a president spoke.
Corrections are less memorable. A false story may be told in one sentence. Its correction may require forensic pathology, radiocarbon context, source tracing or digital analysis. Even after exposure, the original image continues to circulate without the explanation.
The strongest way to understand these episodes is not to ask whether Indonesians were unusually credulous. Similar deceptions occur everywhere. The more useful question is what combination of authority, technology, profit, identity and uncertainty allowed each claim to thrive. Indonesia’s cases are distinctive because they connect supernatural exhibition, contested archaeology, disaster communication, mass politics and digital fraud within a rapidly changing media landscape.
They also demonstrate that debunking is not simply a moment when “the truth comes out”. A laboratory can identify human hair, and a journal can retract a paper, but social meanings survive. A manufactured figure may remain sacred to an owner. A rejected pyramid may remain a symbol of national greatness. A disproved propaganda story may endure in family memory and public monuments. Exposure changes the evidence; changing the story people live with can take generations.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Indonesia's Most Powerful Hoaxes and False Legends. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Ar...
Directly addresses how extraordinary historical and archaeological claims are evaluated and debunked.
Voodoo Histories
Explains how hoaxes, myths and conspiratorial stories gain public traction.
The Demon-haunted World
Provides tools for evaluating extraordinary claims and misinformation.
Imagined Communities
Influential work by a major scholar of Indonesia examining nation-building and collective narratives.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: nobleworld.biz
Title: Lubang Buaya: Myth, Misogyny and Massacre
Link:https://www.nobleworld.biz/images/Drakeley.pdf
Source snippet
NebulaIn a new twist to the propaganda theme it was alleged that the atrocities had actually been carried out by Gerwani members. Thus on...
2.
Source: indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au
Title: the biggest hoax of all the 30 september movement
Link:https://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/the-biggest-hoax-of-all-the-30-september-movement/
Source snippet
Indonesia at MelbourneThe biggest hoax of all: the 30 September Movement16 Jan 2018 — In the history of the Indonesian republic, it is di...
3.
Source: link.springer.com
Link:https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-030-61493
Source snippet
The Sacred Pancasila Museum and Monument (Lubang...July 12, 2025 — This propaganda campaign resulted in the organized massacre o...
Published: July 12, 2025
4.
Source: cjdproject.web.nycu.edu.tw
Title: how the anti communist narrative marginalized the womens movement in indonesia
Link:https://cjdproject.web.nycu.edu.tw/2022/11/29/how-the-anti-communist-narrative-marginalized-the-womens-movement-in-indonesia/
Source snippet
How the Anti-communist Narrative Marginalized...29 Nov 2022 — The Indonesian Army tried to spread libel information through the media ab...
5.
Source: espace.library.uq.edu.au
Title: UQ71502 OA
Link:https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ%3A71502/UQ71502_OA.pdf
Source snippet
UQ LibraryA Fragment of a Story:by A Pohlman · 2004 · Cited by 17 — Stories about the tortures suffered by the alleged Gerwani members wh...
6.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.1932
7.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10990763/2024/31/2
8.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.37QL9G2
9.
Source: time.com
Link:https://time.com/5407798/indonesia-fake-news-briefings/
10.
Source: reuters.com
Title: In Indonesia, Facebook and Twitter are ‘buzzer’
Link:https://www.reuters.com/article/world/in-indonesia-facebook-and-twitter-are-buzzer-battlegrounds-as-elections-loom-idUSKBN1QU0AQ/
11.
Source: reuters.com
Link:https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-checkers-vs-hoax-peddlers-a-fake-news-battle-ahead-of-indonesias-electio-idUSKCN1RM2XL/
12.
Source: inp.polri.go.id
Title: INP | Indonesian National Police INP Arrests Suspect Behind Deepfake Scams
Link:https://inp.polri.go.id/artikel/inp-arrests-suspect-behind-deepfake-scams-impersonating-officials
13.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36Z76PW
14.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/arp.1912
15.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/arp.1932
16.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/arp.1912?msockid=39468b36adb866f730019e55ac016772
17.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.B9KV6ZQ
18.
Source: factcheck.afp.com
Link:https://factcheck.afp.com/list/Indonesia
19.
Source: time.com
Title: indonesia fake news ahok chinese christian islam
Link:https://time.com/4620419/indonesia-fake-news-ahok-chinese-christian-islam/
20.
Source: mjmhsojs.upm.edu.my
Link:https://mjmhsojs.upm.edu.my/index.php/mjmhs/article/view/1232
21.
Source: link.springer.com
Link:https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-84078-4.pdf
22.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: The Guardian’Really, really weak’: experts attack claim that Indonesia
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/dec/16/really-really-weak-experts-attack-claim-that-indonesia-site-is-worlds-oldest-building
Source snippet
December 16, 2023 — 16 Dec 2023 — Sensational report that Indonesia's Gunung Padang site is 25,000 years old is dismissed by archaeologis...
Published: December 16, 2023
23.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Gunung Padang
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunung_Padang
24.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22589663/
25.
Source: en.antaranews.com
Title: Antara News UFO-related “crop circle” found In Yogyakarta rice field
Link:https://en.antaranews.com/news/67268/ufo-related-crop-circle-found-in-yogyakarta-rice-field
26.
Source: news.detik.com
Title: tulisan crop circle di sleman dibuat mahasiswa ugm hoax
Link:https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1554145/tulisan-crop-circle-di-sleman-dibuat-mahasiswa-ugm-hoax
27.
Source: abc.net.au
Title: ABC News The Indonesian artist fooling the world with his photos
Link:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-27/indonesian-artist-fooling-the-world-with-his-photos/9797068
28.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/04/sulawesi-tsunami-indonesia-battles-fake-news-as-hoaxers-spread-panic
29.
Source: abc.net.au
Title: ABC News Internet trolls are trying to bring down Indonesia’s President
Link:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-30/internet-trolls-are-trying-to-bring-down-indonesias-president/10892784
30.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: The Guardian Fake news spikes in Indonesia ahead of elections
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/20/fake-news-spikes-in-indonesia-ahead-of-elections
31.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/461558781861220/posts/1045476456802780/
32.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/johanegerkranspublic/posts/undead-monster-of-the-week-jenglotthe-jenglot-are-creepy-dollsized-mummies-from-/1372348532887099/
33.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/149844915349213/posts/2177451995921818/
34.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/travelGoC/posts/is-this-image-of-a-natural-disaster-authentic-with-ai-its-not-always-obvious-do-/1440074718160119/
35.
Source: facebook.com
Title: researchers retracted a major study claiming gunung padang was an ancient pyrami
Link:https://www.facebook.com/archaicorigins/videos/researchers-retracted-a-major-study-claiming-gunung-padang-was-an-ancient-pyrami/1880811832614599/
36.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/chioma.chinakachigookwum/posts/governor-charles-soludo-targeting-only-native-doctors-while-ignoring-fake-adorat/10163087890043353/
37.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/100092028932726/posts/beware-of-fake-shamans-austrian-woman-scams-victims-by-claiming-jewelry-is-curse/789615690782722/
38.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerwani
39.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jei6xqyFudU
40.
Source: toolbox.google.com
Link:https://toolbox.google.com/factcheck
Additional References
41.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMXdp3CM08c
Source snippet
'The Act of Killing' looks into the mind of war criminals...
42.
Source: youtube.com
Title: ‘The Act of Killing’ looks into the mind of war criminals
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jxl5i30EBfY
Source snippet
Documentary Forces Indonesia to Confront Genocide (LinkAsia: 11/29/13)...
43.
Source: tapol.org
Title: truth about 1965
Link:https://tapol.org/in-the-press/truth-about-1965
Source snippet
The truth about 196510 Jun 2012 — It was alleged that members of Gerwani, a left-wing women's organization, had engaged in obscenities wi...
44.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224966862_Analysis_of_hair_samples_using_microscopical_and_molecular_techniques_to_ascertain_claims_of_rare_animal_species
45.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348557416_An_Analysis_of_Fake_Narratives_on_Social_Media_during_2019_Indonesian_Presidential_Election
46.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/Archaeology/comments/1bjtb5w/controversial_gunung_padang_pyramid_paper/
47.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/47968624/news-stories
48.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/85101674/Examination_Analysis_and_Application_of_Hair_in_Forensic_Science_Animal_Hair
49.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cnp1LwHuHZx/?hl=en
50.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/mystery/comments/jp1xsn/hi_as_indonesian_i_know_this_creatures_we_call/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 192
- Albanian Hoaxes
- Algerian Hoaxes
- Antigua Deceptions
- Argentina Hoaxes
- Armenian Hoaxes
- +187 more in sidebar